This is my first post since the Republican Party’s candidate for President wimped out and conceded the Presidential election. I felt after the fraud that went on, I needed to step back and relax for a while before saying anything more.

An acquaintance asked me today if I knew anything about a bunch of lawsuits going on in order to block Obama from becoming the President. I knew about a couple, but I also think there are more that should happen that I have heard nothing about. Wouldn’t it be interesting to have the first black president attend his first indictments for campaign fraud in his first 100 days of office? No, it will never happen because it would require a majority in the House of Representatives and there are too many other crooked people, regardless of party affiliation, in both the House and the Senate.

The lawsuit he has heard about was about how Obama, despite numerous requests, has refused to demonstrate that he is actually a US citizen by birth, as required by the Constitution. He has shown various versions of a redacted ‘birth certificate’, and that’s where the rub it. It’s a ‘birth certificate’. It says some official believed the original paperwork presented to them as evidence he was born in the US. It is NOT a ‘certificate of birth’ with the doctor’s signature on it.

If Obama is indeed a citizen by birth, let him present his actual ‘certificate of birth’ and be done with it.

The next lawsuit that has not been presented yet, but should be, is for campaign fraud. Campaign fraud can be defined many different ways, but there are only two methods that I am concerned about. The first is that by federal law, an individual can donate up to a maximum amount of money to a person’s campaign - and I believe there are a LOT of people who donated much more than they are allowed. How else does he raise a record $675 MILLION dollars?

A second issue with the campaign financing is that because Obama’s campaign supposedly never tracked the names of any contributions that were less than $50. If you look through their books, you will find literally thousands of contributions of less than $50, and they have screwy names that are obviously false.

A third issue is that campaign contributions from no citizens are not allowed. How can we tell if non-citizens are contributing? Why would someone contribute an odd amount like $36.81? Well, if you contributed 500 Mexican pesos, after conversion to US dollars, that’s exactly how much you would get. And of course, since they are not tracking less than $50, they didn’t figure anyone would notice. From everything I have heard, the campaign had to intentionally disable a lot of security and tracking features in order to not track who and where the money was coming from. At the least, they can correlate the time, date, amount, and the IP address of each contributor (all odd contributions came in from their website.)

Yes, I want to see these questions answered. I also want many of the background questions about Obama, answered, that were previously dismissed as ‘distractions’. I want to find out about how a person can go to school in a religious school for years, in a predominantly Muslim country, and not take on their values any more than a person can go to a church and listen to a radical minister for 20 years and not believe in the same radical teachings as the minister.

I want to know how you can announce your run for the most powerful job in the world in the front room of a man whose girlfriend and best friend were killed while making a bomb to potentially kill judges who uphold the laws of our country. This same person is also a professor teaching at a local university. How can Obama deny having a friendship with this guy?

When I worked for a defense / space contractor in another lifetime, I was told during my orientation that it was extremely important to “avoid the appearance of impropriety.” It was very important because if there were questionable deeds in your past, my employer knew there was a good chance you could be manipulated in order to keep your deeds hidden away. Can you see where this might be important in dealing with high security defense or security situations?

What does this mean? It means that you keep yourself out of situations that might put you in a bad light. It means having good character. It means staying out of the wrong places at all times. It means that you need to walk the straight and narrow.

For most people, I would have to say this would not be too hard. But, if you walk that fine line on a regular basis, if you have dealings with shady people, and you walk that gray line between good and bad, you might have a problem with character. When presented with some of your not-so-honorable deeds, you might try to dismiss them as ‘distractions’.

We already had a president who was a security risk, the first president, since ’security clearances’ were developed, that was not able to be given any kind of security clearance. In other words he was told only what he needed to know. That one president’s name was Bill Clinton. The second president to be impeached. For lying. About cheating on his wife. Of molesting an intern.

Imagine that, we had eight years of a lying and cheating president. He had smaller character flaws than the current President-Elect. Can you imagine what Obama could be like?

Oh yeah, Obama has only won the popular vote, the electoral college has not voted yet, and the issue with Obama’s citizenship will be judged on December 14th, the day the Supreme Court hears the lawsuit about his citizenship.

Enough speculation for one day…

Gardie

Tags: Election Fraud, Obama