Archive for the ‘corruption’ Category

2
Mar

Al Gore’s not going down without a fight

   Posted by: admin

Al Gore's Hearing on Global Warming
Image via Wikipedia

Al Gore writes in his op-ed on the NYT on 2/27/10:

It is true that the climate panel published a flawed overestimate of the melting rate of debris-covered glaciers in the Himalayas, and used information about the Netherlands provided to it by the government, which was later found to be partly inaccurate. In addition, e-mail messages stolen from the University of East Anglia in Britain showed that scientists besieged by an onslaught of hostile, make-work demands from climate skeptics may not have adequately followed the requirements of the British freedom of information law.

But the scientific enterprise will never be completely free of mistakes. What is important is that the overwhelming consensus on global warming remains unchanged. It is also worth noting that the panel’s scientists — acting in good faith on the best information then available to them — probably underestimated the range of sea-level rise in this century, the speed with which the Arctic ice cap is disappearing and the speed with which some of the large glacial flows in Antarctica and Greenland are melting and racing to the sea.

Because these and other effects of global warming are distributed globally, they are difficult to identify and interpret in any particular location. For example, January was seen as unusually cold in much of the United States. Yet from a global perspective, it was the second-hottest January since surface temperatures were first measured 130 years ago.

Similarly, even though climate deniers have speciously argued for several years that there has been no warming in the last decade, scientists confirmed last month that the last 10 years were the hottest decade since modern records have been kept.

The only problem is that his comments and “facts” don’t jive with the head of the East Anglia Climate Research Unit, Phil Jones. On 3/2/10, Prof Phil Jones states it was not standard practice to release data from scientific studies. As quoted in an AFP article on 3/2/2010,

But Phil Jones, of the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit, defended Monday his decision not to release the data about temperatures from around the world, saying it was not “standard practice” to do so.

This is garbage. The basis of scientific method is to release the data to be peer reviewed and the experiments repeated under the same conditions with the same results.

Also, in reference to fabricated data:

Sceptics claimed they showed evidence scientists were manipulating climate data in a bid to exaggerate the case for manmade global warming as world leaders met to try and strike a new accord on climate change.

Jones — who has said the fallout from the affair prompted him to consider suicide — had referred in one private email to a “trick” being employed to massage temperature statistics to “hide the decline”.

He has since insisted the emails had been taken out of context and labelled allegations that he sought to exaggerate warming evidence as “complete rubbish.”

On Mar 1st, 2010, British Parliament cross-examined researchers about the stolen emails and the questionable research practices. Quotes are from an AP article

The academics were questioned by lawmakers because a cache of emails stolen from the research centre and leaked online last year appeared to show that scientists stonewalled climate skeptics, tried to pervert the scientific peer review process, and discussed ways to dodge Freedom of Information requests.

Questioned Monday by parliament’s science committee on why the centre did not make its raw climate data and methodology public, former UEA climate researcher Phil Jones said the data was withheld because it wasn’t “standard practice” to release it.

“The emails reveal doubts as to the reliability of some of the (temperature) reconstructions and raise questions as to the way in which they have been represented,” the Institute of Physics said.

In fact, Phil Jone’s credibility, as well as East Anglia’s CRU’s reputation has been damaged so badly, Philsy stepped down as the director of the CRU. And, as previously reported , Philsy has admitted that there has been no ’statistically significant warming” in the past 15 years.

So in other words, global warming is all bunk, directly from the hore’s mouth.

Now, if you do what the Dems typically start screaming as soon as something happens that they weren’t asked about prior to it happeneing, “Who knew what, when and where?” and also “Follwo the money.”

Let’s look at who knew what and when. Al Gore has known this for quite some time. He has known this was a fraud since before he was elected VP.

Let’s follow the money. How much has Gore made since he became VP? How much has his wealth increased since then? Who does he work for?

His electric bills for his house in TN for one month are more than those of most people for an entire year.

This is Al Gore, the Nobel Prize winner for global warming, and former VP of the US, under Bill Clinton. This is the inventor of the Internet. Who’s full of bull now?

—>Gardie

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

The dominoes have begun to fall.

First, we have the CRU break-in and all the email exposed that showed they were cherry picking the data. This also showed that if they received any official or formal freedom of information requests, they were to deny they had any of the information requested.

Second, we have Prof Phil Jones admit, “there has been no statistically significant warming in the past 15 years.” This is the clown who developed the ‘hockey stick’ graph that the IPCC used to justify yelling “the sky is falling!”

Third, the study that suggested the seas would rise at least one meter, has been withdrawn from Nature due to some significant errors in the data used to arrive at two separate conclusions, specifically those used by the IPCC to yell “the sky is falling!”.

Fourth, the head wank at the UN Climate Division resigns because he sees the writing on the outhouse wall.

If you notice, the progressives, the environuts, and the left wing Dims are acting like the rub has been pulled out from under them. They are beginning to realize they are not going to get their global redistribution of wealth and green energy frauds passed into law by any major government.

Why do you think Obama wanted this crap passed within his first year? He knew that a lie was only good for so long before the thin film of what appeared to be truth began to fail and the truth showed through the cracks.

Good job to all those who continue to apply the pressure! Keep it up!

—>Gardie

COPENHAGEN CLIMATE SUMMIT: 1,200 LIMOS, 140 PRIVATE PLANES…
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenhagen-climate-change-confe/6736517/Copenhagen-climate-summit-1200-limos-140-private-planes-and-caviar-wedges.html

Spews More CO2 than 60 Countries do in Entire Year — COMBINED…
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/international/warm_and_fuzzy_facts_RD1aMFGyyvy19b0ZTHaGwO

Saudia Arabia calls for ‘climategate’ investigation…
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1209/30291.html

UN film shows ‘children of the future facing an apocalypse’…
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hYxzVPlN6_qyl3jRCWg5OwWxvJAA

Gore is working on another Nobel Prize - for Poetry
Gore turns to poetry: ‘The shepherd cries, the hour of choosing has arrived’…
http://www.vanityfair.com/online/politics/2009/12/al-gore-the-poet-laureate-of-climate-change.html

Maybe this is what Global Warming is all about
Copenhagen Prostitutes Offer Free Climate Summit Sex…..
http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/0,1518,665182,00.html

—>Gardie

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Here are today’s load. It’s amazing how all of this is starting to come out. It’s stuff people have been saying and shouted down for for years, and now it’s becoming more mainstream. Of course, you will notice that the mainstream media isn’t picking it up.

HOUSTON EARLIEST SNOWFALL — EVER…
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl//6750042.html

Study: Slowdown in warming last year not permanent…
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CCLC8O0&show_article=1

Rep. Issa: White House refusal to investigate ‘Climategate’ is ‘unconscionable’…
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/70653-rep-issa-white-house-refusal-to-investigate-climategate-is-unconscionable-

Day Fourteen and Counting: Major U.S. Networks Still Silent…
http://mrc.org/press/releases/2009/20091204124643.aspx

Danish Speaker of Parliament: Climate Change ‘Very Dangerous Claim’…
http://politiken.dk/newsinenglish/article851820.ece

Denmark: not as green as you thought…
http://www.nrc.nl/international/article2430374.ece/Denmark_not_as_green_as_you_thought

—>Gardie

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

I have some links for you. These are from DrudgeReport.com that I have collected over the past 5 days or so. If you get the chance, you need to read these and then do your own research. I think you will find, even if you are a hard core believer, there are some serious flaws in all of this research, and certainly enough that this needs to be researched by a whole lot more people than those being funded by pro-green cash sources.

The results of that research needs to be verified by other groups and published in real peer review journals, not those created for the specific purpose of faking a review process.

Anyway, the oldest links are at the bottom, newest at the top.

Obama’s ‘Prestige’ on the Line in Copenhagen, With Climate Deal Far From Certain
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/12/01/obama-climate-change-conference/?loomia_ow=t0:s0:a16:g2:r2:c0.073228:b29164926:z10

PAPER: CLIMATE CHANGE ‘FRAUD’…
http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/143573

Boxer: Hackers should face criminal probe over ‘Climategate’…
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/70249-boxer-hacked-climategate-emails-may-face-criminal-probe

Obama science officials defend warming research…
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CBFB901&show_article=1

Record Snow in Canada, Heavy Snows in Europe…

http://www.firsttracksonline.com/News/2009/12/2/Heavy-Snows-in-Europe-Western-Canada/

Inhofe Asks Boxer to Probe Potential Scientific ‘Conspiracy’…
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/57879

CLIMATEGATE: Scientist at center of e-mail controversy to step down…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/01/AR2009120102737_pf.html

CLIMATEGATE: UK scientist to temporarily step down…
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CAM0VG0&show_article=1

Climategate: Next Aussie election will be fought on climate change…
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/geoffreylean/100018431/climate-e-mails-topple-australian-opposition-leader/

White House still believes ‘climate change is happening’…
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/69797-gibbs-despite-research-dispute-climate-change-is-happening

Hurricane seasons ends, one of calmest since 1990s…
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20091130/D9CA2G4O2.html

CLIMATE-CULT: STUDENTS BRAINWASHED WITH ‘WARMING’ SONG…
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/net_result_sure_beats_nut_revolt_qafIP4m2M9TAty2eLxyz5M

UN DIGS IN ON CLIMATE ‘FRAUD’
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/nov/29/ipcc-climate-change-leaked-emails

FT: Secrecy in science is corrosive force…
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/8aefbf52-d9e1-11de-b2d5-00144feabdc0.html

Climate change’ data dumped…
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6936328.ece

BBC: Inquiry into stolen climate e-mails…
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8383713.stm

Professors in U-turn, will publish all data…
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/copenhagen-climate-change-confe/6678469/Climategate-University-of-East-Anglia-U-turn-in-climate-change-row.html

Climategate: ‘Scientific establishment hopelessly compromised’…
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/6679082/Climate-change-this-is-the-worst-scientific-scandal-of-our-generation.html

The people -vs- the CRU: Freedom of information, my okole…
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/24/the-people-vs-the-cru-freedom-of-information-my-okole%E2%80%A6/

Climategate e-mails sweep America…
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/geraldwarner/100018034/climategate-%20%20e-mails-sweep-america-may-scuttle-barack-obamas-cap-and-trade-laws/

Impression left is global warming game has been rigged from start…
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703499404574559630382048494.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

Pretending climate email leak isn’t crisis won’t make it go away…
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2009/nov/25/monbiot-climate-leak-crisis-response

Gore: Time up for any short-term thinking…
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1b1067b2-dacd-11de-933d-00144feabdc0.html

ONWARD COPENHAGEN…
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.dbd0d58212f48118340a6335d97e2c47.c1&show_article=1

NEW ZEALAND: Climate Science Coalition caught lying about temp trends…
http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2009/11/new_zealand_climate_science_co.php?utm_source=sbhomepage&utm_medium=link&utm_content=channellink

AUSTRALIA: Five MPs lead the way by resigning in disgust over carbon tax…
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100018003/climategate-five-aussie-mps-lead-the-way-by-resigning-in-disgust-over-carbon-tax/

Scientist in climate change ‘cover-up’ storm told to quit…
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1230635/Scientist-climate-change-cover-storm-told-quit.html

Obama to attend beginning of UN climate meeting…
http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE5AO2F120091125

Isn’t that last link a doosey? Even with all of this evidence, Obama is still willing to destroy the way of life of the First World countries so he can rid himself of the guilt associated with living in the US.

—>Gardie

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
22
Nov

A Politician By Any Other Name Is Still A …

   Posted by: admin

What is a woman called who trades favors for money? Let’s look up the definition

Here’s a definition of ‘whore’ from Princeton
1) work as a prostitute
2) have unlawful sex with a whore
3) compromise oneself for money or other gains; “She whored herself to Hollywood
4) prostitute: a woman who engages in sexual intercourse for money

Now let’s examine one of the crucial votes the Democrats needed in the Senate over the weekend, in order to get the raping and pillaging of this country’s Middle Class started.

From the Washington ComPost, we have
“On the eve of Saturday’s showdown in the Senate over health-care reform, Democratic leaders still hadn’t secured the support of Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.), one of the 60 votes needed to keep the legislation alive. The wavering lawmaker was offered a sweetener: at least $100 million in extra federal money for her home state.”

Ok, so what they are really saying is that in order to get Landrieu to vote their way, she was going to have to have something to take to her constituents and say “Here’s what they offered if I voted you into involuntary servitude”.

“And so it came to pass that Landrieu walked onto the Senate floor midafternoon Saturday to announce her aye vote — and to trumpet the financial “fix” she had arranged for Louisiana. “I am not going to be defensive,” she declared. “And it’s not a $100 million fix. It’s a $300 million fix.”

Ok, so she was bought like a common streetwalker for $300 million. Ok, not quite so common for a hooker.

Let’s look at the next one, Lincoln from Arkansas.
“After Landrieu threw in her support (she asserted that the extra Medicaid funds were “not the reason” for her vote), the lone holdout in the 60-member Democratic caucus was Sen. Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas. Like other Democratic moderates who knew a single vote could kill the bill, she took a streetcar named Opportunism, transferred to one called Wavering and made off with concessions of her own. Indeed, the all-Saturday debate, which ended with an 8 p.m. vote, occurred only because Democratic leaders had yielded to her request for more time.

Even when she finally announced her support, at 2:30 in the afternoon, Lincoln made clear that she still planned to hold out for many more concessions in the debate that will consume the next month. “My decision to vote on the motion to proceed is not my last, nor only, chance to have an impact on health-care reform,” she announced. “

Once again, another politician has held out until she got what she wanted. Even though these are only two pronounced examples, you can bet there were many more that happened prior to Saturday’s vote. Because they weren’t the last couple of hold outs, they didn’t get the media exposure.

Another example was for Wyden of Oregon and for Nelson of Nebraska (the other late term holdout).
“Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) won a promise from Reid to support his plan to expand eligibility for health insurance. Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) got Reid to jettison a provision stripping health insurers of their antitrust exemption.”

It’s funny how all the libs and the pro-health care reform idjits have been screaming about stripping the antitrust exemptions from the insurance companies, here’s an example of where the senator wanted it kept *in*. Remember, the antitrust exemptions are STATE laws, not federal laws.

In summary, listen to the Whore from Louisiana, this is not done yet. She still has not been paid enough and she admits it in public.

“But Landrieu had already made up her mind. She went to the floor during the lunch hour to say that she would vote to proceed with the debate — but that she’d be looking for much bigger concessions before she gives her blessing to a final version of the bill.

“My vote today,” she said in a soft Southern accent that masked the hard politics at play, “should in no way be construed by the supporters of this current framework as an indication of how I might vote as this debate comes to an end.” Among the concessions she’ll seek: more tax credits for small business and a removal of the version of the “public option” now in the bill. “

—> Gardie

Even though Fox News has been beating out most other TV media outlets, hands down, they still stood up for what was right - the 1st Amendment to free speech.

From FNC’s website today:

White House Loses Bid to Exclude Fox News From Pay Czar Interview
The Obama administration on Thursday tried to make “pay czar” Kenneth Feinberg available for interviews to every member of the White House pool except Fox News. But the Washington bureau chiefs of the five TV networks decided that none of their reporters would interview Feinberg unless Fox News was included.

Friday, October 23, 2009

The Obama administration on Thursday failed in its attempt to manipulate other news networks into isolating and excluding Fox News, as Republicans on Capitol Hill stepped up their criticism of the hardball tactics employed by the White House.

The Obama administration on Thursday tried to make “pay czar” Kenneth Feinberg available for interviews to every member of the White House pool except Fox News. The pool is the five-network rotation that for decades has shared the costs and duties of daily coverage of the presidency.

But the Washington bureau chiefs of the five TV networks consulted and decided that none of their reporters would interview Feinberg unless Fox News was included.

The administration relented, making Feinberg available for all five pool members and Bloomberg TV.

The pushback came after White House senior adviser David Axelrod told ABC News’ “This Week” on Sunday that Fox News is not a real news organization and other news networks “ought not to treat them that way.”

Media analysts cheered the decision to boycott the Feinberg interview unless Fox News was included, saying the administration’s gambit was taking its feud with Fox News too far. President Obama has already declined to go on “Fox News Sunday,” even while appearing on the other Sunday shows.

“I’m really cheered by the other members saying “No, if Fox can’t be part of it, we won’t be part of it,’” said Baltimore Sun TV critic David Zurawik, calling the move to limit Feinberg’s availability “outrageous.”

“What it’s really about to me is the Executive Branch of the government trying to tell the press how it should behave. I mean, this democracy — we know this — only works with a free and unfettered press to provide information,” he said.

Fox News legal analyst Peter Johnson Jr. said the administration was potentially in violation of the Constitution with its attempt to restrict access to the “eyes and ears” of the country.

“What was averted was a very serious constitutional violation by the White House,” Johnson said. “There cannot be selective and arbitrary access to the White House based on some subjective determination.”

Several top White House advisers have appeared on other news channels to criticize Fox News’ coverage of the administration, dismiss the network as the mouthpiece of the Republican Party and urge other news organizations not to treat Fox News as a legitimate news network.

On Wednesday, Obama, speaking publicly for the first time about his administration’s portrayal of Fox News as illegitimate, said he’s not “losing sleep” over the controversy.

“I think that what our advisers simply said is, is that we are going to take media as it comes,” Obama said when asked about his advisers targeting the network openly. “And if media is operating, basically, as a talk radio format, then that’s one thing. And if it’s operating as a news outlet, then that’s another. But it’s not something I’m losing a lot of sleep over.”

Obama’s comments also came after he met Monday with political commentators Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow of MSNBC; Eugene Robinson and E.J. Dionne of the Washington Post; Ron Brownstein of the National Journal; John Dickerson of Slate; Frank Rich, Maureen Dowd and Bob Herbert of the New York Times; Jerry Seib of the Wall Street Journal, Gloria Borger of CNN and U.S. News and World Report, and Gwen Ifill of PBS.

House Republican leaders rushed to the defense of conservative commentators Thursday after the president’s comments.

Rep. Mike Pence, chairman of the House Republican Conference, said conservative commentators speak more for Americans than the national media outlets that have targeted them for criticism.

“Goaded on by a White House increasingly intolerant of criticism, lately the national media has taken aim at conservative commentators in radio and television,” the Indiana Republican said on the House floor. “Suggesting that they only speak for a small group of activists and even suggesting in one report today that Republicans in Washington are ‘worried about their electoral effect.’ Well, that’s hogwash.”

This is proof that maybe Obama’s corruption is beginning to be noticed by the rest of the media in the US and they are beginning to fight back. No longer will the ‘preferred’ media allow the President to bully those who expose him and his cabinet for their corrpuption in order to keep it all under wraps.

Could we be seeing the beginning of the fall from grace of The Messiah?

—>Gardie

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
John Boehner
Image via Wikipedia

A friend of mine told me about this link today. House Minority Leader John Boehner apparently made the news by calling the new amnsty bill a “piece of s&^%”. It got Lou Dobbs’ attention. He reported on it here.

Amnesty for Illegals - Lou Dobbs

Once again, you need to call your congress critters and remind them who pays the bills. Remind them who puts THEM in their offices in DC and your local district. Remind them that if they don’t listen to you,  that not only will you vote against them, you will make cash contributions to all their their opponents. Even if you don’t live in their district, the promises still work. And don’t forget, even if you don’t live in their district but they hold a leadership position - THEY DO REPRESENT YOU. Call Pelosi’s offices and let her know that she doesn’t speak for you. She might have only been elected by 170,000 votes, but she is the person who controls which bills ever see the light of day. If she doesn’t want them, they never make it to the floor of the house for discussion.

Be Brave, Be Proud, Oppose Unjust Government

—>Gardie

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

CNS News is reporting on a press conference the President of La Raza is supporting ObamaCare for illegals. Amazing… Was this unexpected?

National Council of La Raza President Janet Murguia said that health care reform should include “everyone,”  and this means illegal immigrants as well because with more people paying into the system it might lower the costs of health care.

Speaking to reporters Thursday at a press conference in support of President Barack Obama’s efforts to pass a government-led overhaul of the nation’s health care system, Murguia said that while the issue of illegal immigrants was politically difficult, there were “strong” arguments for covering the illegals.

“From our perspective there’s a strong case to be made in this country for us to reform health care [and] it ought to include everyone,” said Murguia. “There’s a lot of different reasons why we should try to reform this system once and for all so that everyone is covered. The more people who are covered, the more cost-effective and the more and better health outcomes we’re going to have.”

“We know that politically it’s very difficult right now to take on the issue of undocumenteds [but] there’s no reason why we shouldn’t be trying to cover as many people as possible, certainly when it comes to undocumented children,” she said. “Our goal should be to have health care reform for everyone.”

Mr President: “You Lie!”

At a speech before the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute in September, President Obama said, “I want to be clear: If someone is here illegally, they won’t be covered under this plan. That’s a commitment I’ve made.”

Keep up the pressure on ALL senators and representatives! We have got to bury this!

—>Gardie

2
Oct

Obama Bites The Dust

   Posted by: admin

Thankfully, the International Olympic Committee saw through the BS and did not give the 2016 Summer Olympics to Chicago. Maybe they saw the corruption… Maybe they saw the crime rates… Maybe they thought about the fact that summer in Chicago might really suck.

Thank you OIC for using your brains.

This must be a blow for the Bamster. He and his wife tried so hard to tell the world what it would mean to them, personally. Who cares? It’s not about THEM.

And in true, liberal media fashion, Obama’s failure did not make the froint page of the New York Times, it was in the Sports section. You think if Chicago had won the bid that it would have been on teh front page of every newspaper in the country?

I think what was interesting was that former I.O.C. member Kai Holm said it best. It was a hit-and-run by Obama. This was not well thought out (does this sound familiar with his other stunts? ObamaCare, Cap and Tax, GM buyout?).

The appearance by the Obamas was hoped to overcome some of those problems, but the former I.O.C. member Kai Holm told The Associated Press that the brevity of his appearance might have hurt. Holm called it “too businesslike,” adding, “It can be that some I.O.C. members see it as a lack of respect.” (link)

Could it have been that maybe the IOC doesn’t respect Obama? Maybe his apologies and lack of spine demonstrated with all of his other responsibilities told them that Chicago couldn’t be trusted to build the facilities without cost over runs and corruption?

Maybe this is the first chink falling from the brick walls of the Obama Administration. Maybe the announcement today of the increase in unemployment to 9.8% (a 26 year high)might have had something to do with it, especially after promising if we spent $780 BILLION, unemployment wouldn’t go over 8%.

Let’s hope this is the beginning of the end. The house of cards is beginning to fall…

—>Gardie